4.7 Article

Enhancement mechanisms of graphene in nano-58S bioactive glass scaffold: mechanical and biological performance

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep04712

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51222506, 81372366]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0544]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011JQ005, 2012QNZT015]
  5. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation, China [131050]
  6. Shenzhen Strategic Emerging Industrial Development Funds [JCYJ20130401160614372]
  7. Open-End Fund for the Valuable and Precision Instruments of Central South University
  8. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene is a novel material and currently popular as an enabler for the next-generation nanocomposites. Here, we report the use of graphene to improve the mechanical properties of nano-58S bioactive glass for bone repair and regeneration. And the composite scaffolds were fabricated by a homemade selective laser sintering system. Qualitative and quantitative analysis demonstrated the successful incorporation of graphene into the scaffold without obvious structural damage and weight loss. The optimum compressive strength and fracture toughness reached 48.65 +/- 3.19 MPa and 1.94 +/- 0.10 MPa.m(1/2) with graphene content of 0.5 wt%, indicating significant improvements by 105% and 38% respectively. The mechanisms of pull-out, crack bridging, crack deflection and crack tip shielding were found to be responsible for the mechanical enhancement. Simulated body fluid and cell culture tests indicated favorable bioactivity and biocompatibility of the composite scaffold. The results suggest a great potential of graphene/nano-58S composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available