4.7 Article

A method to identify and validate mitochondrial modulators using mammalian cells and the worm C-elegans

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep05285

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  2. VENI grant from ZonMw [91613050]
  3. AMC Postdoc fellowship
  4. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
  5. EU Ideas program [ERC-2008-ADG-231138]
  6. NIH [1R01HL106511, R01AG043930]
  7. Velux Stiftung
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A-124713, 31003A-125487, CSRII3-136201]
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_125487] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondria are semi-autonomous organelles regulated by a complex network of proteins that are vital for many cellular functions. Because mitochondrial modulators can impact many aspects of cellular homeostasis, their identification and validation has proven challenging. It requires the measurement of multiple parameters in parallel to understand the exact nature of the changes induced by such compounds. We developed a platform of assays scoring for mitochondrial function in two complementary models systems, mammalian cells and C. elegans. We first optimized cell culture conditions and established the mitochondrial signature of 1,200 FDA-approved drugs in liver cells. Using cell-based and C. elegans assays, we further defined the metabolic effects of two pharmacological classes that emerged from our hit list, i.e. imidazoles and statins. We found that these two drug classes affect respiration through different and cholesterol-independent mechanisms in both models. Our screening strategy enabled us to unequivocally identify compounds that have toxic or beneficial effects on mitochondrial activity. Furthermore, the cross-species approach provided novel mechanistic insight and allowed early validation of hits that act on mitochondrial function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available