4.7 Article

Experimental demonstration of a transparent graphene millimetre wave absorber with 28% fractional bandwidth at 140 GHz

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep04130

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Graphene Research Centre, University of Cambridge
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK [EP/K01711X/1]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  5. Winston Churchill Trust
  6. International Young Scientist Research Fellowship, National Natural Science Foundation of China
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K01711X/1, EP/I033491/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/K01711X/1, EP/I033491/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of transparent radio-frequency electronics has been limited, until recently, by the lack of suitable materials. Naturally thin and transparent graphene may lead to disruptive innovations in such applications. Here, we realize optically transparent broadband absorbers operating in the millimetre wave regime achieved by stacking graphene bearing quartz substrates on a ground plate. Broadband absorption is a result of mutually coupled Fabry-Perot resonators represented by each graphene-quartz substrate. An analytical model has been developed to predict the absorption performance and the angular dependence of the absorber. Using a repeated transfer-and-etch process, multilayer graphene was processed to control its surface resistivity. Millimetre wave reflectometer measurements of the stacked graphene-quartz absorbers demonstrated excellent broadband absorption of 90% with a 28% fractional bandwidth from 125-165 GHz. Our data suggests that the absorbers' operation can also be extended to microwave and low-terahertz bands with negligible loss in performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available