4.7 Article

Coming down from the trees: Is terrestrial activity in Bornean orangutans natural or disturbance driven?

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep04024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Foundation Abraham
  2. Arcus
  3. Care for the Wild
  4. CGMK
  5. Elephant Family
  6. Ensemble
  7. Margot Marsh
  8. Mohamed bin Zhayed
  9. Shining Hope
  10. Stichting Bring the Elephants
  11. WCN
  12. Wood Tiger
  13. World Land Trust
  14. Zoos of Apenheul, Basel
  15. Zoos of Apenheul, Beauval
  16. Zoos of Apenheul, Boise
  17. Zoos of Apenheul, Cleveland
  18. Zoos of Apenheul, Chester
  19. Zoos of Apenheul, Columbus
  20. Zoos of Apenheul, Houston
  21. Zoos of Apenheul, la Palmyre
  22. Zoos of Apenheul, Oregon
  23. Zoos of Apenheul, Philadelphia
  24. Zoos of Apenheul, Phoenix
  25. Zoos of Apenheul, Saint Louis
  26. Zoos of Apenheul, Toronto
  27. Zoos of Apenheul, Victoria
  28. Zoos of Apenheul, Woodland
  29. US Fish and Wildlife
  30. EAZA
  31. Great Ape TAG Conservation Initiative
  32. Orangutan Project
  33. EM, Arcus
  34. Darwin Initiative
  35. U.K. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
  36. Panthera
  37. Kaplan family
  38. Clouded Leopard Project/Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium
  39. Felidae Conservation Fund
  40. HGH Wills
  41. International Trust for Nature Conservation
  42. Wild About Cats
  43. Houston Zoo
  44. Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences [22251004, 810104300001]
  45. Recanati-Kaplan Foundation
  46. Robertson Foundation
  47. Zoo of Cincinnati
  48. Zoo of Columbus
  49. Zoo of Houston
  50. Zoo of Phoenix
  51. Malaysian Palm Oil Council
  52. SimeDarby Foundation
  53. Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium
  54. Clouded Leopard Project
  55. WWF-Germany
  56. WWF-Malaysia
  57. ClevelandMetroparks
  58. Minnesota Zoo
  59. Nashville Zoo
  60. Panthera Foundation
  61. Zoological Society for the Conservation of Species and Populations
  62. British Ecological Society
  63. Chester Zoo -The North England Zoological Society
  64. Columbus Zoo
  65. Shared Earth Foundation
  66. Usitawi Network
  67. Wild Cat Club
  68. Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research
  69. German Ministry of Science and Education [FKZ033L045]
  70. Zoo Leipzig
  71. Human Evolution Project of KUPRI [24657170]
  72. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia [FRG0098-NSH-1/2007]
  73. Nagao Natural Environment Foundation Japan
  74. PETRONAS
  75. Universiti Malaysia Sabah
  76. Pro Natura Foundation Japan
  77. [22687002]
  78. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25257409, 22221010, 22251004, 14F04387, 24657170, 13J00597, 25650145] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The orangutan is the world's largest arboreal mammal, and images of the red ape moving through the tropical forest canopy symbolise its typical arboreal behaviour. Records of terrestrial behaviour are scarce and often associated with habitat disturbance. We conducted a large-scale species-level analysis of ground-based camera-trapping data to evaluate the extent to which Bornean orangutans Pongo pygmaeus come down from the trees to travel terrestrially, and whether they are indeed forced to the ground primarily by anthropogenic forest disturbances. Although the degree of forest disturbance and canopy gap size influenced terrestriality, orangutans were recorded on the ground as frequently in heavily degraded habitats as in primary forests. Furthermore, all age-sex classes were recorded on the ground (flanged males more often). This suggests that terrestrial locomotion is part of the Bornean orangutan's natural behavioural repertoire to a much greater extent than previously thought, and is only modified by habitat disturbance. The capacity of orangutans to come down from the trees may increase their ability to cope with at least smaller-scale forest fragmentation, and to cross moderately open spaces in mosaic landscapes, although the extent of this versatility remains to be investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available