4.7 Article

Mapping plasmonic near-field profiles and interferences by surface-enhanced Raman scattering

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep03064

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61036013, 61138003]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009DFA52300]
  3. National Research Foundation of Singapore [NRF-G-CRP 2007-01]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Council of the United Kingdom
  5. Leverhulme Trust
  6. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [11JCZDJC15200]
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H000917/2, EP/D063329/1, EP/H006400/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/D063329/1, EP/H006400/1, EP/H000917/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mapping near-field profiles and dynamics of surface plasmon polaritons is crucial for understanding their fundamental optical properties and designing miniaturized photonic devices. This requires a spatial resolution on the sub-wavelength scale because the effective polariton wavelength is shorter than free-space excitation wavelengths. Here by combining total internal reflection excitation with surface-enhanced Raman scattering imaging, we mapped at the sub-wavelength scale the spatial distribution of the dominant perpendicular component of surface plasmon fields in a metal nanoparticle-film system through spectrally selective and polarization-resolved excitation of the vertical gap mode. The lateral field-extension at the junction, which is determined by the gap-mode volume, is small enough to distinguish a spot size, similar to 0.355 lambda(0) generated by a focused radially polarized beam with high reproducibility. The same excitation and imaging schemes are also used to trace near-field nano-focusing and interferences of surface plasmon polaritons created by a variety of plasmon lenses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available