4.7 Article

Facile, scalable synthesis of edge-halogenated graphene nanoplatelets as efficient metal-free eletrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep01810

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. World Class University (WCU)
  2. US-Korea NBIT
  3. Mid-Career Researcher (MCR)
  4. Converging Research Center (CRC)
  5. Basic Research Laboratory (BRL) programs through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea
  6. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)
  7. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research through Asian Office of Aerospace RD (AFOSR-AOARD)
  8. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0037, FA-9550-12-1-0069]
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0019408, 2010-00301, 2012R1A2A2A01045911] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of edge-selectively halogenated (X = Cl, Br, I) graphene nanoplatelets (XGnPs = ClGnP, BrGnP, IGnP) were prepared simply by ball-milling graphite in the presence of Cl-2, Br-2 and I-2, respectively. High BET surface areas of 471, 579 and 662 m(2)/g were observed for ClGnP, BrGnP and IGnP, respectively, indicating a significant extent of delamination during the ball-milling and subsequent workup processes. The newly-developed XGnPs can be well dispersed in various solvents, and hence are solution processable. Furthermore, XGnPs showed remarkable electrocatalytic activities toward oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) with a high selectivity, good tolerance to methanol crossover/CO poisoning effects, and excellent long-term cycle stability. First-principle density-functional calculations revealed that halogenated graphene edges could provide decent adsorption sites for oxygen molecules, in a good agreement with the experimental observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available