4.7 Article

Widespread binding of FUS along nascent RNA regulates alternative splicing in the brain

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep00603

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [206726-CLIP]
  2. Medical Research Council [U105185858]
  3. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0209, J2-2197, L2-1112, Z7-3665, J3-4026]
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. MRC Strategic Grant Award [089701/Z/09/Z]
  6. Motor Neuron Disease Association
  7. Heaton-Ellis Trust
  8. Psychiatry Research Trust
  9. MEXT
  10. CREST, JST
  11. Nakajima Foundation
  12. Wellcome Trust [089701/Z/09/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22500335] Funding Source: KAKEN
  14. Medical Research Council [MC_U105185858, G0900688, MC_G1000733, G0500289B, G0500289] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. MRC [G0900688, MC_U105185858, G0500289, MC_G1000733] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fused in sarcoma (FUS) and TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) are RNA-binding proteins pathogenetically linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), but it is not known if they regulate the same transcripts. We addressed this question using crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (iCLIP) in mouse brain, which showed that FUS binds along the whole length of the nascent RNA with limited sequence specificity to GGU and related motifs. A saw-tooth binding pattern in long genes demonstrated that FUS remains bound to pre-mRNAs until splicing is completed. Analysis of FUS-/- brain demonstrated a role for FUS in alternative splicing, with increased crosslinking of FUS in introns around the repressed exons. We did not observe a significant overlap in the RNA binding sites or the exons regulated by FUS and TDP-43. Nevertheless, we found that both proteins regulate genes that function in neuronal development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available