3.8 Review

Survey of locomotion control of legged robots inspired by biological concept

Journal

SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES F-INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 52, Issue 10, Pages 1715-1729

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-009-0169-7

Keywords

biological inspired control; central pattern generator (CPG); locomotion control

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60875057]
  2. National High-Tech Research & Development Program of ChinA [2009AA04Z213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared with wheeled mobile robots, legged robots can easily step over obstacles and walk through rugged ground. They have more flexible bodies and therefore, can deal with complex environment. Nevertheless, some other issues make the locomotion control of legged robots a much complicated task, such as the redundant degree of freedoms and balance keeping. From literatures, locomotion control has been solved mainly based on programming mechanism. To use this method, walking trajectories for each leg and the gaits have to be designed, and the adaptability to an unknown environment cannot be guaranteed. From another aspect, studying and simulating animals' walking mechanism for engineering application is an efficient way to break the bottleneck of locomotion control for legged robots. This has attracted more and more attentions. Inspired by central pattern generator (CPG), a control method has been proved to be a successful attempt within this scope. In this paper, we will review the biological mechanism, the existence evidences, and the network properties of CPG. From the engineering perspective, we will introduce the engineering simulation of CPG, the property analysis, and the research progress of CPG inspired control method in locomotion control of legged robots. Then, in our research, we will further discuss on existing problems, hot issues, and future research directions in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available