3.8 Article

Strain and kinematic vorticity analysis: An indicator for sinistral transpressional strain-partitioning along the Lancangjiang shear zone, western Yunnan, China

Journal

SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES D-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 602-618

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-009-0065-4

Keywords

strain; kinematic vorticity; transpression; strain partitioning; Lancangjiang shear zone

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40802050, 49802020, 40172074]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20070440065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work deals with the preliminary relationship between strain path and strain partitioning pattern in a sinistral transpressional zone, Lancangjiang shear zone, located to the southeast of Tibet. Various ductile rocks provide an opportunity to investigate quantitative finite strain (R (s)), kinematic vorticity values (W (m) ), and proportions of simple and pure shear components. The mean kinematic vorticity values (W (m) ) were evaluated based on three methods, such as R (s)-theta, prophyroclast hyperbolic distribution method (PHD), and polar Mohr diagram construction (PMD). W (m) for mylonitic metasediments of the low-grade schist belt ranged from 0.19 to 0.54. Protomylonites, mylonites, and ultramylonites recorded differential W (m) values, 0.19-0.73, 0.11-0.8, and 0.84-0.95 (even 0.99) respectively in the high-grade gneiss belt. Based on classical strain analysis and these kinematic vorticity evaluations, the shear zone is classified as a preliminarily bulk monoclinic symmetry. The pattern of vorticity path suggests that a previously undocumented transpressional setting and strain partitioning pattern in the southeast region of Tibet Plateau, characterized by steep-narrow domain of simple-shearing (Tertiary strike-slip shearing) deformation and wider domain of mostly pure-shearing (Tertiary contraction) to accommodate intracontinental deformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available