4.2 Article

Fully automatic characterization and data collection from crystals of biological macromolecules

Journal

ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 1757-1767

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1399004715011918

Keywords

X-ray crystal centring; synchrotron instrumentation; macromolecular crystallography; automation

Funding

  1. ESRF-EMBL Joint Structural Biology Group (JSBG)
  2. ESRF Automation Task Force (ATF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considerable effort is dedicated to evaluating macromolecular crystals at synchrotron sources, even for well established and robust systems. Much of this work is repetitive, and the time spent could be better invested in the interpretation of the results. In order to decrease the need for manual intervention in the most repetitive steps of structural biology projects, initial screening and data collection, a fully automatic system has been developed to mount, locate, centre to the optimal diffraction volume, characterize and, if possible, collect data from multiple cryocooled crystals. Using the capabilities of pixel-array detectors, the system is as fast as a human operator, taking an average of 6min per sample depending on the sample size and the level of characterization required. Using a fast X-ray-based routine, samples are located and centred systematically at the position of highest diffraction signal and important parameters for sample characterization, such as flux, beam size and crystal volume, are automatically taken into account, ensuring the calculation of optimal data-collection strategies. The system is now in operation at the new ESRF beamline MASSIF-1 and has been used by both industrial and academic users for many different sample types, including crystals of less than 20 mu m in the smallest dimension. To date, over 8000 samples have been evaluated on MASSIF-1 without any human intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available