4.6 Article

Effect of CuMn2O4 spinel in Cu-Mn oxide catalysts on selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 49, Pages 25540-25551

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra02824d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Science & Technology Support of China [2011BAE29B02]
  2. Research and Test Center of Materials, Wuhan University of Technology
  3. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology
  4. Laboratory of Living Materials, Wuhan University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the impregnation method, a series of Cu-Mn oxide catalysts were prepared and investigated for the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 at temperatures ranging from 353 K to 453 K. The 0.05Cu-MnOx/TiO2 catalyst shows the highest activity and yields nearly 100% NOx conversion at 453 K using GHSV 40 000 h(-1), while the 0.20Cu-MnOx/TiO2 catalyst exhibits a certain level of potassium tolerance. In addition, the catalysts show favorable stability and water resistance. According to the XRD, EDS and SCR performance results, the existence of a new crystallized CuMn2O4 spinel phase is the dominant parameter for outstanding SCR activity between 413 K and 453 K. TPR, XPS and in situ DRIFT experiments indicate that CuMn2O4 is responsible for low reduction temperature, strong interaction between manganese oxides and copper oxides, high Mn3+ content and numerous acid sites on the surface. Compared with MnOx/TiO2 catalysts, Cu-Mn oxide catalysts could reduce the poisoning effect of potassium, illustrating that the CuMn2O4 phase may play a significant role in K-tolerance. Meanwhile, based on a certain level of potassium tolerance in CuMn2O4, an oxidation mechanism for NO is proposed due to the increase in Mn3+ and the special structure of a spinel oxide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available