4.6 Article

Reticular-vein-like Cu@Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for a non-enzymatic glucose sensor

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 39, Pages 20459-20465

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra02390k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation for Fostering Talents in Basic Research of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [J1103307]
  2. Basic Scientific Research Business Expenses of the Central University and Open Project of Key Laboratory for Magnetism and Magnetic Materials of the Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University [LZUMMM2013004]
  3. National College Students' Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Program of Lanzhou University [20130730096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, reticular-vein-like Cu@Cu2O/rGO nanocomposites have been synthesized by direct redox reaction of Cu and graphene oxide (GO) through a hydrothermal method where the macropore Cu sheets served as the precursor of reticular-vein-like Cu2O as well as the reducing agent of GO. FESEM and TEM were employed to characterize the morphology of the as-prepared samples. The results reveal that the reticular-vein-like Cu@Cu2O nanocomposites are homogeneously anchored onto rGO and act like the skeleton supporting the rGO sheets to avoid its aggregation or stacking. Electrochemical tests show that the Cu@Cu2O/rGO modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) exhibits remarkable electrocatalytic activity towards glucose oxidation in both alkaline medium and human serum, including a wide linear range (0.005-7 mM), a low detection limit (0.5 M), a rapid response (< 2 s) as well as good stability and repeatability. More importantly, the interference from the commonly interfering species such as lactose, fructose, ascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA) can be effectively avoided. All these results indicate this novel nanostructured material is a promising candidate for non-enzymatic glucose sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available