4.6 Article

Minimization of electrical energy consumption in the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) by using immobilized Mg, Ag co-impregnated TiO2 nanoparticles

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 54, Pages 28587-28596

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra03418j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Tehran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium and silver co-impregnated TiO2 nanoparticles were immobilized on a glass plate and used as a fixed-bed system for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) to the less harmful Cr(III). Response surface methodology as a statistical technique was employed for optimizing the preparation conditions of Mg-Ag/TiO2, focusing on minimization of electrical energy consumption as the most important factor in selecting a wastewater treatment technology. Results showed that maximum photocatalytic reduction (84.44%), with minimum electrical energy consumption (30.31 kW h per m(3) per order) were achieved at the optimized preparation conditions: Mg content of 0.82 wt%, Ag content of 2.6 wt%, and calcination temperature of 495 degrees C, whereas at the same conditions, using pure TiO2, Mg/TiO2, and Ag/TiO2 samples lead to 21.17%, 32.59%, and 63.61% photocatalytic reduction rates, and 232.1, 152.03, and 71.42 kW h per m(3) per order electrical energy consumptions, respectively. The optimized Mg, Ag co-impregnated TiO2 nanoparticles were characterized by using XRD, SEM, TEM, DRS, EDX, and PL techniques. The considerable PL quenching in the co-impregnated TiO2 with optimized metals content suggests that the co-impregnation of Mg and Ag onto TiO2 could effectively inhibit the recombination probability of photogenerated electrons-holes pairs. Co-impregnation of Mg and Ag metals, and optimization of preparation conditions provides a synergistic effect in enhancement of the TiO2 activity and effective minimization of the electrical energy consumption and treatment cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available