4.6 Article

The oxidation product (NO3-) of NO pollutant in flue gas used as a nitrogen source to improve microalgal biomass production and CO2 fixation

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 79, Pages 42147-42154

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra05491a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51176163, 51476141]
  2. National High Technology R&D Program of China [2012AA050101]
  3. International Sci. & Tech. Cooperation Program of China [2012DFG61770]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR14E060002]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0446]
  6. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110101110021]
  7. Science and Technology Project of Guangxi Province [1346011-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to eliminate the inhibition effect of the toxic nitric oxide (NO) in flue gas on microalgal growth and CO2 fixation, NO was converted by a wet UV/H2O2 method to produce nitrate (NO3-), which then be used as a nitrogen source for microalgae to improve its growth. The growth ability and biomass compositions of the microalgae cultivated with the produced NO3- from NO gas were similar to those of the microalgae cultivated with equivalent moles of commercial NaNO3. The NO3- concentration produced from NO increased with UV lamp power, H2O2, and NO concentrations, resulting in an improved microalgal growth. The concentration of NO3- from 500 ppm NO wet-oxidized by 6% (v/v) H2O2 and 55 W UV light was up to 8.8 mM. When the produced nitrate was used as supplementary nitrogen source, the maximum growth productivity of Chlorella PY-ZU1 at 15% (v/v) CO2 reached 1.18 g L-1 per day (0.97 times higher than that cultivated with the standard medium). The peak fixation efficiency of 15% (v/v) CO2 was 69.6% (1.13 times higher than that cultivated with the standard medium).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available