4.6 Review

Sub-2 μm fully porous and partially porous (core-shell) stationary phases for reversed phase liquid chromatography

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 44, Pages 22875-22887

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra45418e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [FAPESP 2011/07466-0, 12/10685-8, 2013/15049-5, 2013/04304-4]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq 470916/2012-5, 150098/2014-6]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/10685-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The need for increased throughput and superior performance has increased the demand for stationary phases with improved kinetic performance. Among them, increasing the sample throughput of the ever-growing number of necessary (routine) analyses has become a popular target for reducing precious time. For the past thirty years, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been the leading technology when it comes to various analyses; however, the requirement of typically 10-45 min for serial analyses has been a sample throughput-limiting barrier. Recently, the fundamentals of HPLC have been exploited to develop new technologies that can speed up analyses to ground-breaking limits without compromising separation efficiency. This paper reviews the most promising technologies, including porous sub-2 mm ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and fused-core particle technology, which have the potential to take LC to the next level. As each analytical method has its own demands, the advances of the above mentioned technologies are discussed for different applications where high throughput analysis can be meaningful. Moreover, we discuss and compare the perspectives of these technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available