4.6 Article

Uniform core-shell molecularly imprinted polymers: a correlation study between shell thickness and binding capacity

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 60, Pages 31507-31514

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra03282a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21275158, 21105117]
  2. Innovation Projects of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-206]
  3. 100 Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Core-shell molecularly imprinted polymers (CS-MIPs) have aroused increasing interest owing to their easy accessibility and favorable mass transfer. Herein, we explore the correlation between shell thickness and binding capacity by using Sudan I as template molecule to prepare different CS-MIPs at the surface of carboxyl polystyrene through emulsion polymerization with a two-step temperature-rising process. Extensive characterization was performed using techniques such as SEM/TEM, FT-IR, BET, and TGA. Main factors were systematically studied such as the amount of prepolymer solution, the amount of SDS, and the temperature step. Under the optimized conditions, CS-MIPs with a shell thickness of 2.60 mu m presented the highest binding capacity of 30.1 mu mol g(-1) and the most rapid mass transfer rate. A uniform sphere model was constructed, and it was found that template molecules located in the spherical MIPs with a diameter of 5.20 mu m will be completely eluted, thereby attaining the maximum binding capacity. The static adsorption isotherm followed the Langmuir-Freundlich adsorption model, and the fast kinetics obeyed the pseudo-second-order kinetics model. High recognition specificity for Sudan I with respect to its analogues was displayed, with an imprinting factor of 2.7. The establishment of a critical value of shell thickness provides new insights into the preparation methodology and molecular recognition mechanism of core-shell imprinted polymers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available