4.6 Article

Pillar[5]arene-based phosphine oxides: novel ionophores for solvent extraction separation of f-block elements from acidic media

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 3, Issue 30, Pages 12376-12383

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra41251b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSAF [11076018]
  2. Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Programme [2011FZ0048]
  3. Open Project of Key Laboratory for Radiation Physics and Technology of Ministry of Education [2010-08]
  4. National Fund of China for Fostering Talents in Basic Science [J1210004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new class of pillar[5]arene-based phosphine oxides tethered with ten chelating groups on both rims of the pillar were synthesized via two steps from macrocyclization of 1,4-bis(bromoalkoxy)benzenes with paraformaldehyde, followed by Arbusov reaction with iso-propoxydiphenylphosphine. Solvent extraction of these ligands towards selected lanthanides and actinides was investigated under acidic condition. Compared with acyclic monovalent analogs and classical extractant tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO), the remarkable efficiency and selectivity for thorium(IV) and uranyl(VI) as observed in these novel extractants bearing a varying spacer length revealed the significance of preorganization of chelating groups on pillararene platform. Log-log plot analysis indicated the 1 : 1 stoichiometry (ligand/metal) for the extracted complex formed between the ligand and thorium(IV) or uranyl(VI). The extraction efficiency was considerably improved with increasing acidity in a range of 0.1-1.5 M HNO3, a result that is distinct from the extraction behaviour of calixarene-based phosphine oxides. The extractability increased with enhancing NaNO3 concentration and high salinity assisted the preferential extraction of U(VI) over Th(IV). These ligands also showed moderate efficiency in differentiating europium(III) and americium(III) at 1 M HNO3 in the presence of a synergist (Br-6-COSAN).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available