4.6 Article

Robust and stable intercalated graphene encapsulation of tin nanorods for enhanced cycle and capacity performance for lithium storage

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 3, Issue 44, Pages 21588-21595

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra44109a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF of China [91122034, 51125006, 51102263, 61076062, 21101164, 61106088, 11274328, 61205177, 21201012]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [12XD1406800, 12JC1409000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anode materials (Si, Ge, Sn, etc.) in lithium-ion batteries suffer from a remarkable loss of capacity during the charge-discharge cycle, and various carbon-based additions have been widely added to address this issue. In this work, we report on a simple, one-step approach for an intercalated graphene encapsulation of tin nanorods fabricated via the arc-discharge method. Our method is fast, robust, straight-forward and completely catalyst-free. The result is a Sn@G nanocomposite comprising of a single-crystalline Sn nanorod core tightly bonded to a highly-crystalline graphene shell. The as-synthesized Sn@G exhibits superior cycling and rate performance compared to Sn@C nanocomposite: a reversible specific capacity of 846 mA h g(-1) after 100 cycles at the current density of 200 mA g(-1) and a reversible rate capacity of 488 mA h g(-1) at 2 C for Sn@G, in contrast to the 130 mA h g(-1) and 48 mA h g(-1), respectively for Sn@C. Further, the Sn@G possesses excellent thermal and chemical stabilities against a 950 degrees C N-2 annealing and a 12 h etching in hydrochloric acid, respectively, and has a high mechanical strength as evident by the intercalated core-shell structure maintaining its shape intact in resisting the volume expansion during the 950 degrees C annealing. These encouraging results indicate that an in situ graphene encapsulated tin rods nanocomposite constitutes a highly feasible candidate for use as an anode material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available