Journal
URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 315-329Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-015-0493-1
Keywords
Non-native; Alien; Introduced; Insectivore; Trees; Urban forest; Behavioural flexibility
Funding
- Otago branch of the New Zealand Federation of Graduate Women
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Native landscaping has been proposed as a means of increasing native bird diversity and abundance in urban landscapes. However residents' preferences for vegetation are such that exotic plants are often preferred over natives. We investigated the extent to which native birds foraged in three common native and three exotic tree species in mixed urban woodland during four seasons. We predicted that native birds would spend more time foraging in native trees, and that food resources provided by deciduous exotic trees would be more seasonal than those provided by non-deciduous natives. Native birds spent a lot of time foraging in two of the native tree species, but very little time in native red beech (Nothofagus fusca). They used exotic oak (Quercus robur) throughout the year, and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) seasonally. Oak and European beech (Fagus sylvatica) were used by the largest number of species overall, because they attracted both native and exotic birds. With the exception of tree fuchsia (Fuschia excorticata), which produces large volumes of nectar followed by fruits, all tree species were sources of invertebrates for insectivorous feeding. Seasonality of use was high only in sycamore, indicating limited support for our second prediction. We show that being native doesn't necessarily entail being a good food source for native birds, and popular landscaping exotic species, such as oak, provide foraging opportunities across all seasons.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available