4.5 Article

Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns

Journal

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 95-113

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-015-0477-1

Keywords

Lawns; Residential landscapes; Land management; Human values; Ecosystem services; Urban sustainability

Funding

  1. MacroSystems Biology Program in the Emerging Frontiers Division of the Biological Sciences Directorate at the National Science Foundation (NSF) [EF-1065548, 1065737, 1065740, 1065741, 1065772, 1065785, 1065831, 121238320]
  2. NSF [DEB-0423476, SES-0951366]
  3. Phoenix [BCS-1026865]
  4. Plum Island (Boston) [OCE-1058747]
  5. Cedar Creek (Minneapolis-St Paul) [DEB-0620652]
  6. Florida Coastal Everglades (Miami) [DBI-0620409]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1065831] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Emerging Frontiers [1065548, 1065740, 1065772, 1559611, 1238320, 1561011, 1065785] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  11. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1462086, GRANTS:13800521] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Directorate For Geosciences
  13. Division Of Ocean Sciences [GRANTS:13903780, 1238212] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Division Of Environmental Biology
  15. Direct For Biological Sciences [1027188, 1237517, 1026865] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  16. Division Of Environmental Biology
  17. Direct For Biological Sciences [1234162] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  18. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  19. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0951366] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  20. Emerging Frontiers [1065831] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  21. Emerging Frontiers
  22. Direct For Biological Sciences [GRANTS:13671913, 1065737, 1065741] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although ecosystem services have been intensively examined in certain domains (e.g., forests and wetlands), little research has assessed ecosystem services for the most dominant landscape type in urban ecosystems-namely, residential yards. In this paper, we report findings of a cross-site survey of homeowners in six U.S. cities to 1) examine how residents subjectively value various ecosystem services, 2) explore distinctive dimensions of those values, and 3) test the urban homogenization hypothesis. This hypothesis posits that urbanization leads to similarities in the social-ecological dynamics across cities in diverse biomes. By extension, the thesis suggests that residents' ecosystem service priorities for residential landscapes will be similar regardless of whether residents live in the humid East or the arid West, or the warm South or the cold North. Results underscored that cultural services were of utmost importance, particularly anthropocentric values including aesthetics, low-maintenance, and personal enjoyment. Using factor analyses, distinctive dimensions of residents' values were found to partially align with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment's categories (provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural). Finally, residents' ecosystem service priorities exhibited significant homogenization across regions. In particular, the traditional lawn aesthetic (neat, green, weed-free yards) was similarly important across residents of diverse U.S. cities. Only a few exceptions were found across different environmental and social contexts; for example, cooling effects were more important in the warm South, where residents also valued aesthetics more than those in the North, where low-maintenance yards were a greater priority.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available