4.2 Review

Genetics of Wellbeing and Its Components Satisfaction with Life, Happiness, and Quality of Life: A Review and Meta-analysis of Heritability Studies

Journal

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 137-156

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y

Keywords

Wellbeing; Satisfaction with life; Happiness; Twin; Heritability; Review; Meta-analysis; Genetics; Genes

Funding

  1. VU University Research Chair position
  2. National Institute on Aging [RO1AG033590]
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [NWO 463-06-001, NWO-VENI 451-04-034]
  4. (EMGO+) Institute for Health and Care Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wellbeing is a major topic of research across several disciplines, reflecting the increasing recognition of its strong value across major domains in life. Previous twin-family studies have revealed that individual differences in wellbeing are accounted for by both genetic as well as environmental factors. A systematic literature search identified 30 twin-family studies on wellbeing or a related measure such as satisfaction with life or happiness. Review of these studies showed considerable variation in heritability estimates (ranging from 0 to 64 %), which makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the genetic influences on wellbeing. For overall wellbeing twelve heritability estimates, from 10 independent studies, were meta-analyzed by computing a sample size weighted average heritability. Ten heritability estimates, derived from 9 independent samples, were used for the meta-analysis of satisfaction with life. The weighted average heritability of wellbeing, based on a sample size of 55,974 individuals, was 36 % (34-38), while the weighted average heritability for satisfaction with life was 32 % (29-35) (n = 47,750). With this result a more robust estimate of the relative influence of genetic effects on wellbeing is provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available