3.9 Review

Development of professional expertise in optometry

Journal

Publisher

AMER OPTOMETRIC ASSN INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2011.01.001

Keywords

Professional competence; Continuing education; Professional education; Learning

Categories

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  2. Fondation quebecoise pour la sante visuelle
  3. Canadian Optometric Education Trust Fund (COETF)
  4. American Academy of Optometry and Vistakon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Development of professional expertise is the gradual transition from novice to expert within a profession. Studies on expertise in the profession of optometry have never been published. However, many studies have been performed in other health professions (e.g., nursing, medicine, physical therapy, occupational therapy). METHODS: This report is an overview of the development of professional expertise that will highlight some applications for optometry. RESULTS: A 5-level scale of professional expertise development, divided into 2 parts, is described. The first part is the progression of students during their professional studies (novice, intermediate, competent). The second part is the professional development occurring during the practice years (advanced, expert). Personal and collective efforts are required to foster the progression toward expertise. Great interest for the profession, motivation, and deliberate practice are individual attitudes that help this progression. The optometric community of practice, by means of university (professional) training, continuing education, and collaboration between colleagues, also contributes to this process. CONCLUSION: Professional development is an integral part of the Optometric Oath. Each clinical case is a potential learning experience contributing to one's professional development. Optometrists' attitudes are predominant factors in the progression from one level to another. Optometry 2011;82:218-223

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available