4.3 Article

The IncRNAs PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 are not implicated in castration resistant prostate cancer

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 1434-1438

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1846

Keywords

prostate cancer; long noncoding RNA; androgen receptor

Funding

  1. NIH Prostate Specialized Program of Research Excellence [P50CA69568]
  2. Early Detection Research Network [UO1 CA111275]
  3. US National Institutes of Health [R01CA132874-01A1]
  4. Department of Defense [PC100171, PC094231]
  5. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Scientist Award
  6. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  8. American Cancer Society Research Professor
  9. Taubman Scholar of the University of Michigan
  10. Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award
  11. NIH Predoctoral Fellowship [1F30CA180376-01]
  12. Department of Defense Predoctoral Fellowship [BC100238, W81XWH-13-1-0284]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long noncoding RNAs (IncRNAs) are increasingly implicated in cancer biology, contributing to essential cancer cell functions such as proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. In prostate cancer, several IncRNAs have been nominated as critical actors in disease pathogenesis. Among these, expression of PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 has been identified as a possible component in disease progression through the coordination of androgen receptor (AR) signaling (Yang et al., Nature 2013, see ref. [1]). However, concerns regarding the robustness of these findings have been suggested. Here, we sought to evaluate whether PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 are associated with prostate cancer. Through a comprehensive analysis of RNA-sequencing data (RNA-seq), we find evidence that PCGEM1 but not PRNCR1 is associated with prostate cancer. We employ a large cohort of > 230 high-risk prostate cancer patients with long-term outcomes data to show that, in contrast to prior reports, neither gene is associated with poor patient outcomes. We further observe no evidence that PCGEM1 nor PRNCR1 interact with AR, and neither gene is a component of AR signaling. Thus, we conclusively demonstrate that PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 are not prognostic IncRNAs in prostate cancer and we refute suggestions that these IncRNAs interact in AR signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available