4.3 Article

Induction and transport of Wnt 5a during macrophage-induced malignant invasion is mediated by two types of extracellular vesicles

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages 2057-2066

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1336

Keywords

Breast cancer; exosomes; Evi; microvesicles; macrophages; Wnt 5a

Funding

  1. Deutsche Krebshilfe [109615]
  2. DFG [BI 703/3-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we have shown that macrophage (M Phi)-induced invasion of breast cancer cells requires upregulation of Wnt 5a in M Phi leading to activation of beta-Cateninin-dependent Wnt signaling in the tumor cells. However, it remained unclear, how malignant cells induce Wnt 5a in M Phi and how it is transferred back to the cancer cells. Here we identify two types of extracellular particles as essential for this intercellular interaction in both directions. Plasma membrane-derived microvesicles (MV) as well as exosomes from breast cancer cells, although biologically distinct populations, both induce Wnt 5a in M Phi. In contrast, the particle-free supernatant and vesicles from benign cells, such as platelets, have no such effect. Induction is antagonized by the Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1. Subsequently, Wnt 5a is shuttled via responding M Phi-MV and exosomes to the tumor cells enhancing their invasion. Wnt 5a export on both vesicle fractions depends at least partially on the cargo protein Evenness interrupted (Evi). Its knockdown leads to Wnt 5a depletion of both particle populations and reduced vesicle-mediated invasion. In conclusion, MV and exosomes are critical for M Phi-induced invasion of cancer cells since they are responsible for upregulation of M Phi-Wnt 5a as well as for its delivery to the recipient cells via a reciprocal loop. Although of different biogenesis, both populations share common features regarding function and Evi-dependent secretion of non-canonical Wnts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available