4.7 Article

Mother-Infant Physical Contact Predicts Responsive Feeding among US Breastfeeding Mothers

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu10091251

Keywords

responsive feeding; breastfeeding; breastmilk; babywearing; co-sleeping; mother-infant interaction; feeding cues; maternal responsiveness; mother-infant physical contact; proximal care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Responsive feedinginitiating feeding in response to early hunger cuessupports the physiology of lactation and the development of infant feeding abilities, yet there is a dearth of research examining what predicts responsive feeding. In non-Western proximal care cultures, there is an association between responsive feeding and mother-infant physical contact, but this has not been investigated within Western populations. In two studies, we tested whether mother-infant physical contact predicted feeding in response to early hunger cues versus feeding on a schedule or after signs of distress among U.S. breastfeeding mothers. With an online questionnaire in Study 1 (n = 626), physical contact with infants (via co-sleeping and babywearing) predicted increased likelihood of self-reported responsive feeding. Mothers who reported responsive feeding were more likely to exclusively breastfeed for the first six months, breastfeed more frequently throughout the day, and had a longer planned breastfeeding duration than mothers who reported feeding on a schedule or after signs of infant distress. In Study 2 (n = 96), a three-day feeding log showed that mother-infant physical contact predicted feeding in response to early hunger cues but mother-infant proximity (without physical contact) did not. In sum, our results demonstrate that physical contact with infants may shape breastfeeding behavior among U.S. mothers, highlighting a connection between social interaction and infant nutrition that warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available