4.5 Article

Fitting the pieces together: current research on the genetic basis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Journal

NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 551-560

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S11322

Keywords

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); genetics; molecular genetics; genome-wide association study (GWAS); gene-environment interplay

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Action Medical Research
  3. Baily Thomas Charitable Fund
  4. Medical Research Council [G0801418B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly disruptive childhood-onset disorder that often persists into adolescence and adulthood. Comorbidity with other problems, such as autism, dyslexia and conduct disorder (CD) is very common. Although little is known about the pathophysiology of ADHD, family, twin and adoption studies have shown that it is highly heritable. Whole genome linkage studies suggest there are no common susceptibility genes of moderate effect size. Most published research has been based on functional candidate gene studies. The most consistent evidence for association with ADHD relates to a dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene variable number tandem repeat (VNTR), a dopamine D5 receptor (DRD5) gene microsatellite and a dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene VNTR. In addition, the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) val158/108 met variant has been shown to increase risk for associated antisocial behavior. The first genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of ADHD have been completed and although larger studies are still required to detect common risk variants, novel risk pathways are being suggested for ADHD. Further research on the contribution of rare variants, larger genome-wide association and sequencing studies and ADHD phenotype refinement is now needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available