3.8 Editorial Material

Thrombolysis for acute stroke under antiplatelet therapy: safe enough to be beneficial?

Journal

NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE NEUROLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages 474-475

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncpneuro0867

Keywords

acute ischemic stroke; antiplatelet therapy; net benefit; symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; thrombolysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controversy exists over whether chronic antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke is a contraindication to treatment with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Antiplatelets impair thrombocyte function and might, therefore, increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. This Practice Point commentary discusses a recent study by Uyttenboogaart et al. that aimed to further explore the interactions between antiplatelet and tPA therapies. The single-center study, which included 301 consecutive patients with ischemic stroke, found that the incidence of SICH was indeed increased among patients who were pretreated with antiplatelets, but that these patients nevertheless had a greater net benefit of thrombolysis than did those who had not received previous antiplatelet therapy. The commentary authors consider the study's shortcomings, but conclude that the widespread practice of using tPA in the presence of antiplatelet therapy is justified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available