4.8 Article

Greening of the land surface in the world's cold regions consistent with recent warming

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 825-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0258-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA Terrestrial Ecology Program IDS Award [NNH17AE86I]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global ecosystem function is highly dependent on climate and atmospheric composition, yet ecosystem responses to environmental changes remain uncertain. Cold, high-latitude ecosystems in particular have experienced rapid warming(1), with poorly understood consequences(2-4). Here, we use a satellite-observed proxy for vegetation cover-the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation(5)-to identify a decline in the temperature limitation of vegetation in global ecosystems between 1982 and 2012. We quantify the spatial functional response of maximum annual vegetation cover to temperature and show that the observed temporal decline in temperature limitation is consistent with expectations based on observed recent warming. An ensemble of Earth system models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) mischaracterized the functional response to temperature, leading to a large overestimation of vegetation cover in cold regions. We identify a 16.4% decline in the area of vegetated land that is limited by temperature over the past three decades, and suggest an expected large decline in temperature limitation under future warming scenarios. This rapid observed and expected decline in temperature limitation highlights the need for an improved understanding of other limitations to vegetation growth in cold regions(3,4,6), such as soil characteristics, species migration, recruitment, establishment, competition and community dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available