4.8 Article

The temperature response of soil microbial efficiency and its feedback to climate

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 395-398

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1796

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF
  2. NSF Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) Program
  3. DOE National Institute for Climatic Change Research (NICCR)
  4. Harvard Forest Bullard Fellowship
  5. NSF LTER programme
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1237491] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soils are the largest repository of organic carbon (C) in the terrestrial biosphere and represent an important source of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere, releasing 60-75 Pg C annually through microbial decomposition of organic materials(1,2). A primary control on soil CO2 flux is the efficiency with which the microbial community uses C. Despite its critical importance to soil-atmosphere CO2 exchange, relatively few studies have examined the factors controlling soil microbial efficiency. Here, we measured the temperature response of microbial efficiency in soils amended with substrates varying in lability. We also examined the temperature sensitivity of microbial efficiency in response to chronic soil warming in situ. We find that the efficiency with which soil microorganisms use organic matter is dependent on both temperature and substrate quality, with efficiency declining with increasing temperatures for more recalcitrant substrates. However, the utilization efficiency of a more recalcitrant substrate increased at higher temperatures in soils exposed to almost two decades of warming 5 degrees C above ambient. Our work suggests that climate warming could alter the decay dynamics of more stable organic matter compounds, thereby having a positive feedback to climate that is attenuated by a shift towards a more efficient microbial community in the longer term.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available