4.8 Review

Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 417-424

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1456

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D001544/1, NE/D001536/1, NE/D001587/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [NE/D001536/1, NE/D001587/1, NE/D001544/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22101005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is large uncertainty about the magnitude of warming and how rainfall patterns will change in response to any given scenario of future changes in atmospheric composition and land use. The models used for future climate projections were developed and calibrated using climate observations from the past 40 years. The geologic record of environmental responses to climate changes provides a unique opportunity to test model performance outside this limited climate range. Evaluation of model simulations against palaeodata shows that models reproduce the direction and large-scale patterns of past changes in climate, but tend to underestimate the magnitude of regional changes. As part of the effort to reduce model-related uncertainty and produce more reliable estimates of twenty-first century climate, the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project is systematically applying palaeoevaluation techniques to simulations of the past run with the models used to make future projections. This evaluation will provide assessments of model performance, including whether a model is sufficiently sensitive to changes in atmospheric composition, as well as providing estimates of the strength of biosphere and other feedbacks that could amplify the model response to these changes and modify the characteristics of climate variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available