4.8 Article

Changes in South Pacific rainfall bands in a warming climate

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 417-423

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1726

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science (BER) US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER64469]
  2. US National Science Foundation [1049219]
  3. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement
  6. Australian Climate Change Science Program
  7. CSIRO Office of Chief Executive Science Leader programme
  8. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [1049238] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1049219] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The South Pacific Convergence Zone (SPCZ) is the largest rainband in the Southern Hemisphere and provides most of the rainfall to southwest Pacific island nations. In spite of various modelling efforts, it remains uncertain how the SPCZ will respond to greenhouse warming. Using a hierarchy of climate models we show that the uncertainty of SPCZ rainfall projections in present-generation climate models can be explained as a result of two competing mechanisms. Higher tropical sea surface temperatures lead to an overall increase of atmospheric moisture and rainfall whereas weaker sea surface temperature gradients dynamically shift the SPCZ northeastward and promote summer drying in areas of the southwest Pacific. On the basis of a multi-model ensemble of 76 greenhouse warming experiments and for moderate tropical warming of 1-2 degrees C we estimate a 6% decrease of SPCZ rainfall with a multi-model uncertainty exceeding +/- 20%. For stronger tropical warming exceeding 3 degrees C, a tendency for a wetter SPCZ region is identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available