3.8 Article

Dilution-to-extinction cultivation of leaf-inhabiting endophytic fungi in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) - Different cultivation techniques influence fungal biodiversity assessment

Journal

MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 645-654

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.02.002

Keywords

Dilution-to-extinction cultivation; Foliar endophytic fungus; Particle filtration; Species-accumulation curve; Species richness estimator

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two cultivation-based isolation techniques - the incubation of leaf fragments (fragment plating) and dilution - to-extinction culturing on malt extract agar - were compared for recovery of foliar endophytic fungi from Fagus sylvatica near Greifswald, north-east Germany. Morphological-anatomical characters of vegetative and sporulating cultures and ITS sequences were used to assign morphotypes and taxonomic information to the isolates. Data analysis included species-accumulation curves, richness estimators, multivariate statistics and null model testing. Fragment plating and extinction culturing were significantly complementary with regard to species composition, because around two-thirds of the 35 fungal taxa were isolated with only one of the two cultivation techniques. The difference in outcomes highlights the need for caution in assessing fungal biodiversity based upon single isolation techniques. The efficiency of cultivation-based studies of fungal endophytes was significantly increased with the combination of the two isolation methods and estimations of species richness, when compared with a 20-years old reference study, which needed three times more isolates with fragment plating to attain the same species richness. Intensified testing and optimisation of extinction culturing in endophyte research is advocated. (C) 2009 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available