4.5 Article

Picture Naming and Verbal Fluency in Children With Cochlear Implants

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 1870-1882

Publisher

AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0321

Keywords

cochlear implants; language; naming; lexical access; lexical representations; lexical organization; children

Funding

  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [5R01DC011041, F32DC006786]
  2. CUNY Graduate Center
  3. Children's Hearing Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: In the present study, the authors examined lexical naming in children with cochlear implants (CIs). The goal was to determine whether children with CIs have deficits in lexical access and organization as revealed through reaction time in picture-naming and verbal fluency (VF) experiments. Method: Children with CIs (n = 20, ages 7-10) were compared with 20 children with normal hearing (NH) matched for age and nonverbal IQ. Lexical abilities were examined using two naming tasks: a timed picture-naming task and a phonological and semantic VF naming task. Picture naming taps into lexical access capabilities and the VF task elucidates lexical organization. Results: No group differences were found between children with CIs and children with NH on the timed picture-naming task. Children with CIs generated significantly fewer words than the children with NH on the VF tasks. Larger group differences were found for the phonological VF task compared with the semantic VF task. Conclusions: Limited early linguistic and auditory experiences may affect lexical representations and organization (lexical-semantic connections) in school-age children with hearing loss who use CIs. Further analyses and studies should continue to examine these underlying linguistic deficits. The present results suggest a need to emphasize not only increasing the size of children's vocabularies during therapy, but also expanding and increasing the semantic and phonological richness of their lexical representations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available