4.5 Article

Listening Effort With Cochlear Implant Simulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 1075-1084

Publisher

AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0074)

Keywords

cochlear implants; listening effort; dual task; reaction time; computer simulation; hearing; speech perception

Funding

  1. Cochlear Ltd, Dorhout Mees, Stichting Steun Gehoorgestoorde Kind
  2. Heinsius Houbolt Foundation
  3. Rosalind Franklin Fellowship from the University of Groningen
  4. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [016.096.397]
  5. Cochlear Implant Center Northern Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Fitting a cochlear implant (CI) for optimal speech perception does not necessarily optimize listening effort. This study aimed to show that listening effort may change between CI processing conditions for which speech intelligibility remains constant. Method: Nineteen normal-hearing participants listened to CI simulations with varying numbers of spectral channels. A dual-task paradigm combining an intelligibility task with either a linguistic or nonlinguistic visual response-time (RT) task measured intelligibility and listening effort. The simultaneously performed tasks compete for limited cognitive resources; changes in effort associated with the intelligibility task are reflected in changes in RT on the visual task. A separate self-report scale provided a subjective measure of listening effort. Results: All measures showed significant improvements with increasing spectral resolution up to 6 channels. However, only the RT measure of listening effort continued improving up to 8 channels. The effects were stronger for RTs recorded during listening than for RTs recorded between listening. Conclusion: The results suggest that listening effort decreases with increased spectral resolution. Moreover, these improvements are best reflected in objective measures of listening effort, such as RTs on a secondary task, rather than intelligibility scores or subjective effort measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available