4.5 Article

Physical activity stimulation program for children with cerebral palsy did not improve physical activity: a randomised trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 40-49

Publisher

AUSTRALIAN PHYSIOTHERAPY ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.007

Keywords

Cerebral palsy; Motor activity; Directive counselling; Home; Exercise therapy; Fitness training; Physical activity; Children

Funding

  1. ZonMw [89000002]
  2. Johanna Kinderfonds
  3. Stichting Rotterdams Kinderrevalidatie Fonds Adriaanstichting
  4. Revalidatiefonds
  5. Phelps Stichting
  6. Revalidatie Nederland
  7. Nederlandse Vereniging van Revalidatieartsen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Question: In children with cerebral palsy, does a 6-month physical activity stimulation program improve physical activity, mobility capacity, fitness, fatigue and attitude towards sports more than usual paediatric physiotherapy? Design: Multicentre randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessments and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Forty-nine walking children (28 males) aged 7-13 years with spastic cerebral palsy and severity of the disability classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System level I-III. Intervention: The intervention group followed a 6-month physical activity stimulation program involving counselling through motivational interviewing, home-based physiotherapy, and 4 months of fitness training. The control group continued their usual paediatric physiotherapy. Outcome measures: Primary outcomes were walking activity (assessed objectively with an activity monitor) and parent-reported physical activity (Activity Questionnaire for Adults and Adolescents). Secondary outcomes were: mobility capacity, consisting of Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), walking capacity and functional strength, fitness (aerobic and anaerobic capacity, muscle strength), self-reported fatigue, and attitude towards sport (child and parent). Assessments were performed at baseline, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results: There were no significant intervention effects for physical activity or secondary outcomes at any assessment time. Positive trends were found for parent-reported time at moderate-to-vigorous intensity (between-group change ratio = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and GMFM-66 (mean between-group difference = 2.8 points, 95% CI 0.2 to 5.4) at 6 months, but not at 12 months. There was a trend for a small, but clinically irrelevant, improvement in the children's attitudes towards the disadvantages of sports at 6 months, and towards the advantages of sports at 12 months. Conclusions: This physical activity stimulation program, that combined fitness training, counselling and home-based therapy, was not effective in children with cerebral palsy. Further research should examine the potential of each component of the intervention for improving physical activity in this population. (C) 2014 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available