4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Genetic and environmental influences on early speech, language and literacy development

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 397-408

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.03.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0500079] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [R13 DC003383] Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G0500079] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0500079, G9817803B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic and environmental etiology of speech and broader language skills was examined in terms of their concurrent relationships in young children; their longitudinal association with reading; and the role they play in defining the 'heritable phenotype' for specific language impairment (SLI). The work was based on a large sample of 4 1/2-year-old twins, who were assessed at home on a broad range of speech and language measures as part of the Twins Early Development Study. We found that genetic factors strongly influence variation in young children's speech in typical development as well as in SLI, and that these genetic factors also account for much of the relationship between early speech and later reading. In contrast, shared environmental factors play a more dominant role for broader language skills, and in relating these skills to later reading; isolated impairments in language as opposed to speech appear to have largely environmental origins. Learning outcomes: (1) Readers will be able to discuss some of the ways in which behavioural genetic methods can make a useful contribution to the field of communication disorders. (2) Readers will be able to compare the genetic and environmental contributions to general language versus speech skills in young children. (3) Readers will be able to describe the likely relationship between early speech and language and later reading development, in terms of shared genetic and environmental resources. (4) Readers will be able to discuss how different ascertainment methods for clinical samples may lead to very different understandings of the nature of a disorder such as specific language impairment. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available