4.6 Article

Estimation of diffusion coefficients from voltammetric signals by support vector and gaussian process regression

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-6-30

Keywords

Support vector regression; Gaussian process regression; Diffusion coefficient; Principal component analysis; Voltammetry; Reaction mechanism

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Support vector regression (SVR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were used for the analysis of electroanalytical experimental data to estimate diffusion coefficients. Results: For simulated cyclic voltammograms based on the EC, E-qr, and EqrC mechanisms these regression algorithms in combination with nonlinear kernel/covariance functions yielded diffusion coefficients with higher accuracy as compared to the standard approach of calculating diffusion coefficients relying on the Nicholson-Shain equation. The level of accuracy achieved by SVR and GPR is virtually independent of the rate constants governing the respective reaction steps. Further, the reduction of high-dimensional voltammetric signals by manual selection of typical voltammetric peak features decreased the performance of both regression algorithms compared to a reduction by downsampling or principal component analysis. After training on simulated data sets, diffusion coefficients were estimated by the regression algorithms for experimental data comprising voltammetric signals for three organometallic complexes. Conclusions: Estimated diffusion coefficients closely matched the values determined by the parameter fitting method, but reduced the required computational time considerably for one of the reaction mechanisms. The automated processing of voltammograms according to the regression algorithms yields better results than the conventional analysis of peak-related data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available