4.4 Article

Impact of nitrogen addition on plant community in a semi-arid temperate steppe in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARID LAND
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 3-10

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1227.2012.00003

Keywords

nitrogen addition; species richness; biomass; functional group; temperate steppe; Duolun, Inner Mongolia

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40771188, 41071151]
  3. NSFC [30821003]
  4. DFG Research Training Group [GK1070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased nitrogen (N) deposition will often lead to a decline in species richness in grassland ecosystems but the shifts in functional groups and plant traits are still poorly understood in China. A field experiment was conducted at Duolun, Inner Mongolia, China, to investigate the effects of N addition on a temperate steppe ecosystem. Six N levels (0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 g N/(m(2).a)) were added as three applications per year from 2005 to 2010. Enhanced N deposition, even as little as 3 g N/(m(2).a) above ambient N deposition (1.2 g N/(m(2).a)), led to a decline in species richness of the whole community. Increasing N addition can significantly stimulate aboveground biomass of perennial bunchgrasses (PB) but decrease perennial forbs (PF), and induce a slight change in the biomass of shrubs and semi-shrubs (SS). The biomass of annuals (AS) and perennial rhizome grasses (PR) accounts for only a small part of the total biomass. Species richness of PF decreased significantly with increasing N addition rate but there was a little change in the other functional groups. PB, as the dominant functional group, has a relatively higher height than others. Differences in the response of each functional group to N addition have site-specific and species-specific characteristics. We initially infer that N enrichment stimulated the growth of PB, which further suppressed the growth of other functional groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available