4.2 Article

Effect of solution pH on SO2, NOx, and Hg removal from simulated coal combustion flue gas in an oxidant-enhanced wet scrubber

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 212-220

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2011.642951

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. EPA (Office of Air and Radiation [OAR] and Office of Research and Development [ORD])
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a study on the simultaneous removal of SO2, NOx and Hg (both Hg-0 and Hg2+) from a simulated flue gas by oxidant injection in a bench-simulated wet limestone scrubber for a wide range of slurry pH. The slurry pH strongly influenced the chemical mechanism in the scrubber and, therefore, affected pollutant removal. This paper also examines the potential ClO2(gas) reemission from a developed multipollutant scrubber at different slurry pHs. To better understand the chemical mechanisms at each slurry pH and to apply a mass balance to the process, detailed product ion analyses were performed for all experiments. Ion analysis covered three different chlorine species (chlorite, chloride, chlorate), sulfate, nitrite and nitrate. Different NOx removal efficiencies and mechanisms were found in acidic and alkaline pHs in the multipollutant scrubber The acidic solution was favorable for NO and Hg-0 oxidation, but increasing the slurry pH above 7.0 was disadvantageous for NO and Hg oxidation/removal. However, the rate of NOx absorption (by percentage) was higher for the alkaline solution. Implications: This paper demonstrated a method for controlling multipollutant (SO2, NOx, Hg) emissions from a gas stream of a stationary combustion source in a wet limestone wet-FGD scrubber enhanced by an oxidizing additive. This paper explores how the flue gas conditions, especially the slurry pH, affect the chemical mechanisms of the multipollutant process and the pollutant removal efficiencies. The pH may be important when considering the location of oxidant injection into the scrubber/channel, where local parameters such as pH strongly vary. The usage of chlorite additive is potentially threatens ClO2(gas) emission; therefore, research in this area was also presented in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available