4.5 Article

Environmental controls of plant species richness in riparian wetlands: Implications for restoration

Journal

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 480-489

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2015.04.013

Keywords

Wetland restoration; Biodiversity; Vegetation; Rich fen; Nitrate; Hydrology; Phosphorus

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research projects MONITECH [2104-08-0050]
  2. BUFFER-TECH [1305-00017B]
  3. European Union [244121, 282656]
  4. Carlsberg Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wetland restoration projects often focus on mitigating losses of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) toward downstream aquatic recipients and, so far, there is no clear guidance on how to restore environmental conditions to improve biodiversity values in the restored areas. However, to provide such guidance, it is necessary to obtain a better understanding of the factors driving biodiversity in natural wetlands. For this purpose, we investigated plant community characteristics in 35 plots located at 10 Danish riparian wetlands to identify critical factors required to sustain species diversity. We hypothesized that species richness is influenced by groundwater characteristics and nutrient availability and that threshold values for these environmental variables can be defined to characterize conditions needed to sustain high diversity plant communities, We found that high groundwater level (less than 37 cm depth) and low soil phosphorus content (<347 mu g cm(-3)) were two important drivers of plant species richness. Furthermore, at high groundwater and low soil phosphorus content, low nitrogen concentration in the groundwater also favors greater species richness. Our results imply that establishment of a groundwater table close to the soil surface and low nutrient availability are important factors for improving species richness in restored areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available