4.1 Article

Walk ratio (step length/cadence) as a summary index of neuromotor control of gait: application to multiple sclerosis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 265-269

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328347be02

Keywords

gait; multiple sclerosis; outcome assessment; walk ratio

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In healthy adults, the step length/cadence ratio [walk ratio (WR) in mm/(steps/min) and normalized for height] is known to be constant around 6.5 mm/(step/min). It is a speed-independent index of the overall neuromotor gait control, in as much as it reflects energy expenditure, balance, between-step variability, and attentional demand. The speed independence of the WR in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and its capacity to discriminate (a) across patients with MS and controls and (b) among disability levels in MS were tested. The WR was computed in 30 outpatients with MS [20 women, 10 men; Extended Disability Status Scale (potential range: 0-10, observed median 3.5, range 2.5-5.0)] walking at free speed (range: 0.43-1.67ms(-1)), and in 30 healthy controls (20 women, 10 men) at free and slow speed (range: 0.55-1.67ms(-1)). The WR was 6.38 +/- 0.66 in controls versus 5.36 +/- 0.86 in patients with MS (P < 0.000), independent of age, sex, and walking speed. The WR was 5.95 +/- 0.69 and 4.90 +/- 0.70 in patients with an Extended Disability Status Scale score (P < 0.001) below or above the median, respectively, independent of the disease duration (P < 0.000). In patients with MS, the WR is a disability-sensitive index of neuromotor control of gait, and thus a promising outcome measure for treatments aimed at improving motor coordination. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 34:265-269 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available