4.2 Article

Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in the Shaanxi Province in China: implications for the future

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 12-17

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-014-0037-4

Keywords

Affordability; Availability; China; Essential medicine; Pharmacoepidemiology; Prices; WHO/HAI methodology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In 2009, China implemented the National Essential Medicines System (NEMS) to improve access to high-quality low-cost essential medicines. Objective To measure the prices, availability and affordability of medicines in China following the implementation of the NEMS. Setting 120 public hospitals and 120 private pharmacies in ten cities in Shaanxi Province, Western China. Method The standardized methodology developed by the World Health Organization and Health Action International was used to collect data on prices and availability of 49 medicines. Main outcome measures Median price ratio; availability as a percentage; cost of course of treatment in days' wages of the lowest-paid government workers. Results In the public hospitals, originator brands (OBs) were procured at 8.89 times the international reference price, more than seven times higher than the lowest-priced generics (LPGs). Patients paid 11.83 and 1.69 times the international reference prices for OBs and generics respectively. A similar result was observed in the private pharmacies. The mean availabilities of OBs and LPGs were 7.1 and 20.0 % in the public hospitals, and 12.6 and 29.2 % in the private pharmacies. Treatment with OBs is therefore largely unaffordable, but the affordability of the LPGs is generally good. Conclusion High prices and low availability of survey medicines were observed. The affordability of generics, but not OBs, is reasonable. Effective measures should be taken to reduce medicine prices and improve availability and affordability in Shaanxi Province.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available