4.8 Article

Porous carbonized graphene-embedded fungus film as an interlayer for superior Li-S batteries

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 224-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.001

Keywords

Filamentous fungus; Graphene nanosheets; Lithium-sulfur batteries; Interlayer

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934103, 2012CB933003]
  2. Changjiang Scholars Program of Ministry of Education of China-Distinguished Professor [T2011116]
  3. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [50925417, 51425204]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51374237, 51272197]
  5. Shanghai Tongji Gao Tingyao Environmental Science Et Technology Development Foundation
  6. Hubei Province Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2014CFA035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene-embedded carbon fiber (GFC) film has been fabricated by using filamentous fungus (Aspergillus niger) as carbonizable fibers to drive the graphene nanosheets to embed in the hyphae network system and then carbonizing at 700 degrees C. The molecular structure of the GFC film is primarily composed of aromatic components, and the film is doped by N (8.62%) and 0 (8.12%) elements. The conductivity of the final product reaches as high as 0.71 S cm(-1). The GFC film serves as the conductive interlayer to greatly improve the performance of Li-S batteries including capacity retention and rate capability. By inserting the GFC film, the battery can deliver a capacity of similar to 700 mAh g(-1) after 300 cycles at 1 C. Even performed at 5 C, it is able to deliver a reversible capacity of more than 650 mAh g(-1). This research presents a facile and effective method for the fabrication of superior macroscopic carbon monolith, which holds great potential in other forms of electrochemical energy storage. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available