4.8 Article

Metal-like fluorine-doped β-FeOOH nanorods grown on carbon cloth for scalable high-performance supercapacitors

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 119-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.10.005

Keywords

Fluorine-doped beta-FeOOH nanorods; Supercapacitor; Large power density and energy density; Large-scale fabrication

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB934700, 2013CB933900, 2014CB931800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21431006, 91022032, 91227103, 21061160492, J1030412]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZD-EW-M01-1]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M550346]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At present, supercapacitors employed in the market have been growing rapidly, including portable electronics, hybrid electric vehicles, and industrial electric systems. Nevertheless, there are some limitations in supercapacitor devices, such as low energy density and high production cost, which are recognized as the major challenges for their developments. The performance of these devices depends intimately on the properties of electrode materials, therefore one of the most intensive approaches is to design novel electrode materials. Herein, a new scalable electrode material, metal-like fluorine-doped beta-FeOOH nanorods grown on carbon cloth has been engineered for enhancing the energy density meanwhile retaining the high power density of the supercapacitor via an easy, low-cost, and large-scale fabrication approach. The optimal supercapacitor device exhibits a high-class supercapacitor performance with a good rate capability, high energy density (1.85 mW h cm(-3)), large power density (11.11 W cm(-3)), and long cycle span (no decrease of capacitance after 5000 cycles). Moreover, this kind of material represents an alternative promising candidate for large-scale and high-performance energy storage devices. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available