4.5 Article

Optimization of GFP Fluorescence Preservation by a Modified uDISCO Clearing Protocol

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROANATOMY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00067

Keywords

tissue optical clearing; whole-brain imaging; green fluorescent protein; fluorescence preservation; uDISCO; a-uDISCO

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0700501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571002, 81701354]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Group of China [61721092]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612463, 2018T110772]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST [2018KFYXKJC026]
  6. WNLO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue optical clearing techniques provide alternative approaches for imaging large-volume specimens. uDISCO, an organic-solvent-based method, stands out from the enormous array of available optical clearing methods by achieving whole-brain imaging with high transparency, size reduction and fluorescence preservation. In this study, we aimed to modify the uDISCO protocol to achieve better fluorescence preservation and to thereby further improve its optical imaging quality. First, we determined the optimal pH value for optimized uDISCO, termed a-uDISCO (alkaline pH-based uDISCO). Then, we compared fluorescence preservation between a-uDISCO and uDISCO. In addition, we validated the clearing performance of the optimized method according to several parameters, including tissue transparency, size changes, and the maintenance of cell morphology. Finally, we demonstrated that a-uDISCO enabled the high-quality brain-wide visualization of neuronal structures. This method potentially provides a better alternative for high-throughput imaging of samples with low-level fluorescence protein expression or for archiving and repetitive revisiting of rare samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available