4.5 Article

The female protective effect in autism spectrum disorder is not mediated by a single genetic locus

Journal

MOLECULAR AUTISM
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13229-015-0014-3

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Sex bias; Female protective effect; GWAS

Funding

  1. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at Washington University (NIH/NICHD) [P30 HD062171]
  2. Simons Foundation (SFARI) [307705]
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. [R01 HD042541]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A 4:1 male to female sex bias has consistently been observed in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Epidemiological and genetic studies suggest a female protective effect (FPE) may account for part of this bias; however, the mechanism of such protection is unknown. Quantitative assessment of ASD symptoms using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) shows a bimodal distribution unique to females in multiplex families. This leads to the hypothesis that a single, common genetic locus on chromosome X might mediate the FPE and produce the ASD sex bias. Such a locus would represent a major therapeutic target and is likely to have been missed by conventional genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis. Methods: To explore this possibility, we performed an association study in affected versus unaffected females, considering three tiers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as follows: 1) regions of chromosome X that escape X-inactivation, 2) all of chromosome X, and 3) genome-wide. Results: No evidence of a SNP meeting the criteria for a single FPE locus was observed, despite the analysis being well powered to detect this effect. Conclusions: The results do not support the hypothesis that the FPE is mediated by a single genetic locus; however, this does not exclude the possibility of multiple genetic loci playing a role in the FPE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available