4.3 Article

Research using electronic patient records in general practice. The EGPRN meeting in Bertinoro, Italy, May 2009

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 186-189

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13814788.2010.501374

Keywords

Electronic patient records; general practice; family medicine; research; methodology; Europe; European General Practice Research Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The European General Practice Research Network organized an international workshop on research using electronic patient records in Bertinoro, Italy, in May 2009. The authors were keynote speakers at the workshop, tasked with summarizing the theme research presentations on each of the two days of the meeting. The conference discussed the utility of capturing data in a way that can be appropriately analysed. In this application, the use of ICPC was repeatedly mentioned. Such research requires disciplined data entry and retrieval, and many times consistency in coding is a challenge, which may be met by definitions for coded classes. Quality of data is a concern in such research, and there were suggestions to involve the patients in improving the quality of their record. Clinicians are qualified to code data into electronic patient records accurately, capturing the fine nuances of the consultation. Income incentives, such as the Quality Outcomes Framework, run the risk of data distortion to improve financial gain. The role of all family doctors in research was emphasized, and the full potential of collecting data from family practice is practically achievable only through large databases collecting clinical records from every practice. EGPRN has dealt with this emerging theme in primary care research over the years. Interested family doctors are invited to attend future conferences to develop collaborative research projects using electronic patient records.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available