4.2 Article

Transmission dynamics of Chlamydia trachomatis affect the impact of screening programmes

Journal

EPIDEMICS
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 123-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2010.04.002

Keywords

Chlamydia trachomatis; Mathematical model; Transmission dynamics; Screening; Asymptomatic period

Funding

  1. UK National Institute for Health (NIHR) [07/42/02]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030-118424]
  3. National Institute for Health Research [07/42/02] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_118424] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the impact of screening programmes in reducing the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, mathematical and computational models are used as a guideline for decision support. Unfortunately, large uncertainties exist about the parameters that determine the transmission dynamics of C. trachomatis. Here, we use a SEIRS (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered-susceptible) model to critically analyze the turnover of C. trachomatis in a population and the impact of a screening programme. We perform a sensitivity analysis on the most important steps during an infection with C. trachomatis. Varying the fraction of the infections becoming symptomatic as well as the duration of the symptomatic period within the range of previously used parameter estimates has little effect on the transmission dynamics. However, uncertainties in the duration of temporary immunity and the asymptomatic period can result in large differences in the predicted impact of a screening programme. We therefore analyze previously published data on the persistence of asymptomatic C. trachomatis infection in women and estimate the mean duration of the asymptomatic period to be longer than anticipated so far, namely 433 days (95% CI: 420-447 days). Our study shows that a longer duration of the asymptomatic period results in a more pronounced impact of a screening programme. However, due to the slower turnover of the infection, a substantial reduction in prevalence can only be achieved after screening for several years or decades. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available