4.5 Article

Assisting manual literature curation for protein-protein interactions using BioQRator

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/database/bau067

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1A2044389, 2011-0022437, 2012R1A1A2002804]
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A2002804, 2011-0022437, 2012R1A1A2044389] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time-consuming nature of manual curation and the rapid growth of biomedical literature severely limit the number of articles that database curators can scrutinize and annotate. Hence, semi-automatic tools can be a valid support to increase annotation throughput. Although a handful of curation assistant tools are already available, to date, little has been done to formally evaluate their benefit to biocuration. Moreover, most curation tools are designed for specific problems. Thus, it is not easy to apply an annotation tool for multiple tasks. BioQRator is a publicly available web-based tool for annotating biomedical literature. It was designed to support general tasks, i. e. any task annotating entities and relationships. In the BioCreative IV edition, BioQRator was tailored for protein-protein interaction (PPI) annotation by migrating information from PIE the search. The results obtained from six curators showed that the precision on the top 10 documents doubled with PIE the search compared with PubMed search results. It was also observed that the annotation time for a full PPI annotation task decreased for a beginner-intermediate level annotator. This finding is encouraging because text-mining techniques were not directly involved in the full annotation task and BioQRator can be easily integrated with any text-mining resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available