4.2 Article

Herpes simplex virus type 2 and syphilis infections with HIV: an evolving synergy in transmission and prevention

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 294-299

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32832c1881

Keywords

genital ulcer disease; HIV; herpes simplex virus type 2; male circumcision; prevention trials; syphilis; Treponema pallidum

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) and syphilis are associated with HIV infection. The purpose of this review is to summarize the advances in the relationship of HSV-2 and syphilis with HIV, highlighting intervention trials to prevent HIV acquisition and transmission. Recent findings HIV acquisition has often been linked to genital ulcers due to HSV-2 and syphilis. The latest pathophysiological studies have continued to elucidate the relationship between HSV-2, syphilis and HIV, establishing that both syphilitic and HSV-2-infected tissue have increased numbers of chemokine receptor 5-expressing T cells, and several models have further emphasized the viral synergy between HSV-2 and HIV. In clinical trials, HSV suppressive therapy decreased HIV RNA levels that might affect transmission, but two trials have failed to prevent HIV acquisition. Male circumcision, however, prevents both HIV and HSV-2 acquisition. Summary Genital ulcers from HSV-2 and syphilis are associated with HIV acquisition. The exact role for these HIV cofactors is still unknown and exemplified by the failure of HSV suppressive therapy to decrease HIV acquisition. Male circumcision, however, reduces HSV-2 acquisition. With several HSV suppressive trials to prevent HIV transmission and disease progression currently ongoing, the future promises to provide more critical information for the control of HIV infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available